Securing the Digital Gateway: A Comprehensive Review of Identity and Access Management in Modern Application Security | IJCT Volume 13 – Issue 3 | IJCT-V13I3P86

International Journal of Computer Techniques
ISSN 2394-2231
Volume 13, Issue 3  |  Published: May – June 2026

Author

SHARAD SHARMA^

Abstract

As Application Security controls are increasingly moving towards curbing attacks at the entry point of an application, where users attempt to access the application resources, the category of Identity Management has gained immense importance in the realm of application security. This paper gives a short snapshot of Identity Management and its role in protecting the various applications at Enterprise as well as Consumer facing applications. The paper starts with an introduction to Identity Management giving details of Digital Identities, the Identity Management (IM) Life Cycle, various Authentication & Authorization Mechanisms along with standards and protocols that are relevant for Identity Federation such as OAuth, OpenID Connect, and SAML. The paper thereafter introduces the Application Security domain along with Vulnerabilities and controls to address the same. Also, various identities management controls that can be put in place to help eliminate such vulnerabilities in an application like Principle of Least Privilege, Defense-in-Depth etc. Following this the paper elaborates on the various aspects of authentication starting from the traditional native application or user Password based authentication to step up Multifactor authentication, Biometric Authentication, Password less authentication and Adaptive Risk based Authentication. Similarly, it also covers Authorization and Access Control Models such as Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC), Policy based access control (PBAC), Fine Grained Access Control along with Delegated Authorization. The paper then moves towards challenges faced in an application where an Identity and Access Management (IAM) solution is implemented, such as Scalability and Performance, User Privacy and Governance- General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), Financial integrity – Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) requirements, Identity Federation and SSO challenges, Identity and Access Management for Identity Life Cycle such as Provisioning and Deprovisioning and Threats such as Identity Spoofing, Session Hijacking and Insider Threats. At the end the paper covers Emerging Trends and Technologies in the space of Identity Management such as Decentralized Identity, Blockchain etc., Artificial Intelligence for Anomaly Detection etc., Zero Trust Security Model and Identity as a Service (IDaaS). This paper will focus on human identities defined later and does not elaborate on the privileged or machine identities or non-human identities.

Keywords

Identity Management, Application Security, Authentication, Authorization, Access Control, Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), Single Sign-On (SSO), Identity Federation, OAuth, OpenID Connect, SAML, Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC), Zero Trust, Identity as a Service (IDaaS), Policy based access control (PBAC), Cybersecurity, Open Worldwide Application Security Project (OWASP), Privacy Compliance, Identity Lifecycle Management

Conclusion

Identity management is a key enabler of application security, ensuring that access to sensitive resources is constrained by authorized users and devices. Identity management avoids the risks of unauthorized access, identity theft, and insider threats, which are among the most pressing challenges in the modern application environment. The challenges in identity management include scalability in large-scale and federated environments, privacy regulations (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA), complexity in SSO and Federation, identity lifecycle management issues (timely provisioning and de-provisioning), and sophisticated threats (e.g., identity spoofing, session hijacking). Strategies for mitigating these challenges include the use of decentralized (e.g., blockchain) identity management approaches that provide enhanced user control and trust, the use of AI-based anomaly detection approaches, the use of Zero Trust Architecture that enforces continuous access validation with least privilege access, and the adoption of IDaaS (Identity as a Service) designs that provide flexibility in scalability management while preserving user privacy and security. Future research will focus on overcoming scalability and integration challenges in decentralized blockchain identity management approaches, on enhancing the accuracy and explainability of AI-based anomaly detection systems, on developing seamless integration approaches for Zero Trust Architecture in evolving application architectures, and on developing effective privacy-preserving mechanisms for cloud-based identity management. Technological advancements will bring self-sovereign identities into widespread use, integrate blockchain and AI-based systems to enhance trust, and develop adaptive identity management systems that address evolving insider threats and novel attack patterns (Khayer et al., 2025; Diro et al., 2024).

References

1)Prajapati, V. (2025). Role of Identity and Access Management in Zero Trust Architecture for Cloud Security: Challenges and Solutions. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology, 6–18. https://doi.org/10.48175/ijarsct-23902 2)Alsirhani, A., Ezz, M., & Mohamed Mostafa, A. (2022). Advanced Authentication Mechanisms for Identity and Access Management in Cloud Computing. Computer Systems Science and Engineering, 43(3), 967–984. https://doi.org/10.32604/csse.2022.024854 3)Nzeako, G., & Shittu, R. (2024). Leveraging AI for enhanced identity and access management in cloud-based systems to advance user authentication and access control. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 24(3), 1661–1674. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.24.3.3501 4)Liu, Y., Sun, G., & Schuckers, S. (2019, June 1). Enabling Secure and Privacy Preserving Identity Management via Smart Contract. https://doi.org/10.1109/cns.2019.8802771 5)Lesavre, L. (2020). A Taxonomic Approach to Understanding Emerging Blockchain Identity Management Systems. National Institute Of Standards Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/nist.cswp.01142020 6)Zhu, X., & Badr, Y. (2018). Identity Management Systems for the Internet of Things: A Survey Towards Blockchain Solutions. Sensors, 18(12), 4215. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18124215 7)Naik, N., & Jenkins, P. (2016, March 1). A Secure Mobile Cloud Identity: Criteria for Effective Identity and Access Management Standards. https://doi.org/10.1109/mobilecloud.2016.22 8)Naik, N., & Jenkins, P. (2017). Securing digital identities in the cloud by selecting an opposite Federated Identity Management from SAML, OAuth and OpenID Connect. 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1109/rcis.2017.7956534 9)Fredj, O. B., Cheikhrouhou, O., Krichen, M., Hamam, H., & Derhab, A. (2021). An OWASP Top Ten Driven Survey on Web Application Protection Methods (pp. 235–252). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68887-5_14 10)Lala, S. K., Kumar, A., & T, S. (2021, May 6). Secure Web development using OWASPGuidelines. https://doi.org/10.1109/iciccs51141.2021.9432179 11)Khayer, B., Mirzaei, S., Alavizadeh, H., & Salehi Shahraki, A. (2025). Blockchain for Secure IoT: A Review of Identity Management, Access Control, and Trust Mechanisms. IoT, 6(4), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/iot6040065 12)Kron, E. (2018). Effective foundational security principles. Cyber Security: A Peer-Reviewed Journal, 1(4), 343. https://doi.org/10.69554/efpq5846 13)Jiang, Q., Wei, F., Fu, S., Ma, J., Li, G., & Alelaiwi, A. (2015). Robust extended chaotic maps-based three-factor authentication scheme preserving biometric template privacy. Nonlinear Dynamics, 83(4), 2085–2101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-015-2467-5 14)Alsaleem, B. O., & Alshoshan, A. I. (2021). Multi-Factor Authentication to Systems Login. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/nccc49330.2021.9428806 15)Ratha, N. K., Connell, J. H., & Bolle, R. M. (2001). Enhancing security and privacy in biometrics-based authentication systems. IBM Systems Journal, 40(3), 614–634. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.403.0614 16)Sarkar, A., & Singh, B. K. (2020). A review on performance, security and various biometric template protection schemes for biometric authentication systems. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 79(37–38), 27721–27776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09197-7 17)Dasgupta, D., Roy, A., & Nag, A. (2017). Multi-Factor Authentication (pp. 185–233). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58808-7_5 18)Ibrokhimov, S., Hui, K. L., Abdulhakim Al-Absi, A., Lee, H. J., & Sain, M. (2019). Multi-Factor Authentication in Cyber Physical System: A State of Art Survey. 279–284. https://doi.org/10.23919/icact.2019.8701960 19)Ghorbani Lyastani, S., Schilling, M., Neumayr, M., Backes, M., & Bugiel, S. (2020). Is FIDO2 the Kingslayer of User Authentication? A Comparative Usability Study of FIDO2 Password less Authentication. 268–285. https://doi.org/10.1109/sp40000.2020.00047 20)Lazouski, A., Martinelli, F., & Mori, P. (2010). Usage control in computer security: A survey. Computer Science Review, 4(2), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2010.02.002 21)Servos, D., & Osborn, S. L. (2017). Current Research and Open Problems in Attribute-Based Access Control. ACM Computing Surveys, 49(4), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/3007204 22)Bhatt, S., Patwa, F., & Sandhu, R. (2016, November 1). An Attribute-Based Access Control Extension for OpenStack and Its Enforcement Utilizing the Policy Machine. https://doi.org/10.1109/cic.2016.019 23)Iyer, P., & Masoumzadeh, A. (2018). Mining Positive and Negative Attribute-Based Access Control Policy Rules. 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1145/3205977.3205988 24)Das, S., Mitra, B., Atluri, V., Vaidya, J., & Sural, S. (2018). Policy Engineering in RBAC and ABAC (pp. 24–54). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04834-1_2 25)Karimi, L., Aldairi, M., Joshi, J., & Abdelhakim, M. (2021). An Automatic Attribute-Based Access Control Policy Extraction from Access Logs. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 19(4), 2304–2317. https://doi.org/10.1109/tdsc.2021.3054331 26)Zhang, X., Li, Y., & Nalla, D. (2005). An attribute-based access matrix model. 359–363. https://doi.org/10.1145/1066677.1066760 27)Folorunso, A., Adewumi, T., Adewa, A., Okonkwo, R., & Olawumi, T. (2024). Impact of AI on cybersecurity and security compliance. Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, 21(1), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.30574/gjeta.2024.21.1.0193 28)Singhal, S. (2024). Data Privacy, Compliance, and Security Including AI ML (pp. 111–126). Igi Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2909-2.ch009 29)Barbaria, S., Jemai, A., Ceylan, H. İ., Muntean, R. I., Dergaa, I., & Boussi Rahmouni, H. (2025). Advancing Compliance with HIPAA and GDPR in Healthcare: A Blockchain-Based Strategy for Secure Data Exchange in Clinical Research Involving Private Health Information. Healthcare, 13(20), 2594. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13202594 30)Mbah, G., & Evelyn, A. (2024). AI-powered cybersecurity: Strategic approaches to mitigate risk and safeguard data privacy. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 24(3), 310–327. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.24.3.3695 31)Alhasan, T. K. (2025). Managing legal risks in health information exchanges: A comprehensive approach to privacy, consent, and liability. Journal of Healthcare Risk Management : The Journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management, 44(4), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhrm.70002 32)Sutradhar, S., Karforma, S., Bose, R., Roy, S., Djebali, S., & Bhattacharyya, D. (2023). Enhancing identity and access management using Hyperledger Fabric and OAuth 2.0: A block-chain-based approach for security and scalability for healthcare industry. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 4, 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.07.004 33)Martinez, D., Magdalena, L., & Savitri, A. N. (2024). AI and Blockchain Integration: Enhancing Security and Transparency in Financial Transactions. International Transactions on Artificial Intelligence (ITALIC), 3(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.33050/italic.v3i1.651 34)Grüner, A., Mühle, A., Gayvoronskaya, T., & Meinel, C. (2019). A Comparative Analysis of Trust Requirements in Decentralized Identity Management (pp. 200–213). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15032-7_18 35)Stockburger, L., Kokosioulis, G., Mukkamala, A., Mukkamala, R. R., & Avital, M. (2021). Blockchain-enabled decentralized identity management: The case of self-sovereign identity in public transportation. Blockchain: Research and Applications, 2(2), 100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcra.2021.100014 36)Bouras, M. A., Lu, Q., Dhelim, S., & Ning, H. (2021). A Lightweight Blockchain-Based IoT Identity Management Approach. Future Internet, 13(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13020024 37)Gruner, A., Muhle, A., Gayvoronskaya, T., & Meinel, C. (2018, July 1). A Quantifiable Trust Model for Blockchain-Based Identity Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/cybermatics_2018.2018.00250 38)Lee, J.-H. (2018). BIDaaS: Blockchain Based ID As a Service. IEEE Access, 6, 2274–2278. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2782733 39)Singla, A., Gupta, N., Aeron, P., Jain, A., Sharma, D., & Bharadwaj, S. S. (2022). Decentralized Identity Management Using Blockchain. Journal of Global Information Management, 31(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.315283 40)Pokhrel, S. R., Yang, L., Rajasegarar, S., & Li, G. (2024). Robust Zero Trust Architecture: Joint Blockchain based Federated learning and Anomaly Detection based Framework. 48, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3672200.3673878 Diro, A., Zhou, L., Saini, A., Kaisar, S., & Hiep, P. C. (2024). Leveraging zero knowledge proofs for blockchain-based identity sharing: A survey of advancements, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 80, 103678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2023.103678

How to Cite This Paper

SHARAD SHARMA (2026). Securing the Digital Gateway: A Comprehensive Review of Identity and Access Management in Modern Application Security. International Journal of Computer Techniques, 13(3). ISSN: 2394-2231.

© 2026 International Journal of Computer Techniques (IJCT). All rights reserved.

Submit Your Paper