Risk Management and Decision-Making Practices Among School Leaders in Chivi District, Zimbabwe | IJCT Volume 13 – Issue 2 | IJCT-V13I2P14

International Journal of Computer Techniques
ISSN 2394-2231
Volume 13, Issue 2  |  Published: March – April 2026

Author

Dr. Evershine Ndongwe

Abstract

This study examines how school leaders in Chivi District, Zimbabwe, perceive, prioritise, and manage risk within resource-constrained rural school environments. Drawing on risk governance theory and bounded rationality, the study explores how structural vulnerabilities shape leadership decision-making and institutional management practices. A mixed-methods design was employed, combining quantitative survey data from 60 school leaders with qualitative interviews to examine patterns of risk exposure, leadership responses, and contextual constraints affecting risk governance. The findings indicate that financial instability (88%), safety hazards (82%), and infrastructural deficits (79%) represent the most significant risks affecting school operations. While many schools implement visible safety measures such as drills and security procedures, formal governance mechanisms—including systematic risk assessments, financial audits, and structured community risk committees—remain limited. Regression analysis further reveals that resource availability, risk management training, leadership experience, and stakeholder participation significantly predict risk management effectiveness, with resource availability emerging as the strongest predictor. Qualitative findings highlight additional constraints including resource scarcity, limited professional training in risk governance, bureaucratic restrictions, and weak community engagement. These conditions contribute to largely reactive leadership practices. The study introduces the concept of risk-mediated leadership, emphasising institutional stability as a priority in high-vulnerability educational contexts.

Keywords

Risk governance; School leadership; Decision-making; Rural education; Institutional resilience

Conclusion

This study examined how school leaders in Chivi District, Zimbabwe, perceive and manage institutional risks within resource-constrained rural school environments. The findings demonstrate that risk management forms a central dimension of leadership practice in contexts characterised by financial uncertainty, infrastructural challenges, and limited institutional resources. The study revealed that financial instability, safety hazards, and deteriorating infrastructure represent the most significant risks affecting school operations. While school leaders have adopted visible safety practices such as drills and basic security measures, systematic governance mechanisms—including formal risk assessments, financial oversight structures, and structured community risk committees—remain limited. Regression analysis further indicated that resource availability, risk management training, leadership experience, and stakeholder participation significantly influence the effectiveness of school-level risk management practices. Among these factors, resource availability emerged as the strongest predictor, highlighting the importance of institutional capacity in strengthening risk governance. The study contributes to educational leadership scholarship by introducing the concept of risk-mediated leadership, which recognises that leadership priorities in high-risk environments often emphasise institutional stability and operational resilience before instructional transformation. Overall, the findings suggest that strengthening risk governance within rural schools requires coordinated policy support, leadership capacity development, and improved resource allocation mechanisms.

References

Aven, T., & Renn, O. (2010). Risk management and governance: Concepts, guidelines and applications. Risk Analysis, 30(10), 1423–1435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01454.x Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Sage. Boin, A., ’t Hart, P., Stern, E., & Sundelius, B. (2017). The politics of crisis management: Public leadership under pressure (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press. Bush, T. (2018). School leadership and management in developing countries: Challenges and opportunities. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(2), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217733905 Bush, T. (2020). Theories of educational leadership and management (5th ed.). Sage. Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2014). School leadership models: What do we know? School Leadership & Management, 34(5), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.928680 Bush, T., & Oduro, G. K. T. (2006). New principals in Africa: Preparation, induction and practice. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(4), 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230610676587 Chikoko, V. (2016). The role of school heads in promoting effective community participation in rural Zimbabwe. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(3), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214558572 Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2014). Resilient teachers, resilient schools: Building and sustaining quality in testing times. Routledge. Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press. Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2016). Coherence: The right drivers in action for schools, districts, and systems. Corwin. Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111116699 Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership & Management, 30(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632431003663214 Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press. Harris, A. (2013). Distributed leadership: Friend or foe? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213497635 Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2018). Leading schools as learning organizations. School Leadership & Management, 38(4), 351–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2018.1483553 International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 31000: Risk management—Guidelines. ISO. Jones, B. D. (2017). Bounded rationality. Annual Review of Political Science, 20, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050216-092420 Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077 Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2012). The nature and effects of transformational school leadership: A meta-analytic review. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(3), 387–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11436268 Lumby, J., & Foskett, N. (2016). International perspectives on leadership and management. Sage. Mapolisa, T., & Tshabalala, T. (2013). School–community partnerships in rural Zimbabwe. Journal of Educational Studies, 12(2), 45–58. OECD. (2013). Leadership for 21st century learning. OECD Publishing. OECD. (2019). School leadership for learning: Insights from TALIS 2018. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/2e0c5d6a-en OECD. (2020). Education leadership and resilience. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/7d1d5f7c-en Pashiardis, P., & Johansson, O. (2016). Successful school leadership: International perspectives. Bloomsbury. Pont, B., Nusche, D., & Moorman, H. (2008). Improving school leadership: Policy and practice. OECD Publishing. Renn, O. (2008). Risk governance: Coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Earthscan. Robinson, V. (2011). Student-centered leadership. Jossey-Bass. Sergiovanni, T. J. (2007). Rethinking leadership: A collection of articles. Corwin Press. Shava, G. N., & Tlou, F. (2018). School leadership and governance in rural education contexts in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 60, 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.10.010 Simon, H. A. (1979). Rational decision making in business organizations. American Economic Review, 69(4), 493–513. Southworth, G. (2009). Learning-centred leadership. In B. Davies (Ed.), The essentials of school leadership (pp. 91–111). Sage. Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass. UNESCO. (2016). Leading better learning: School leadership and quality in education. UNESCO. UNESCO. (2017). School leadership for learning in Africa. UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning. UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education—All means all. UNESCO. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO. UNICEF. (2023). Strengthening school safety and resilience in vulnerable contexts. UNICEF. World Bank. (2018). World development report 2018: Learning to realize education’s promise. World Bank. World Bank. (2021). Realizing the future of learning: From learning poverty to learning for everyone, everywhere. World Bank.

How to Cite This Paper

Dr. Evershine Ndongwe (2026). Risk Management and Decision-Making Practices Among School Leaders in Chivi District, Zimbabwe. International Journal of Computer Techniques, 13(2). ISSN: 2394-2231.

© 2026 International Journal of Computer Techniques (IJCT). All rights reserved.

Submit Your Paper