
Designing Hybrid Blockchain Architectures: Defining Functional Roles for Private and Public Chains in Enterprise Applications | IJCT Volume 12 – Issue 6 | IJCT-V12I6P44

International Journal of Computer Techniques
ISSN 2394-2231
Volume 12, Issue 6 | Published: November – December 2025
Table of Contents
ToggleAuthor
Dhruv Srivastava, Dr. Kismat Chhillar
Abstract
The design of hybrid blockchain architectures presents a compelling approach to reconciling the contrasting demands of privacy, transparency, and scalability in enterprise applications. This paper explores the strategic delineation of functional roles between private and public blockchain networks within a unified hybrid framework. Private blockchains are tasked with managing confidential operations, enforcing permissioned access controls, and ensuring compliance with regulatory standards, while public blockchains facilitate auditability, decentralized validation, and promote trust through their transparent and immutable nature. The study systematically examines architectural components and interaction protocols that enable seamless communication and interoperability between these two layers, emphasizing modular, scalable solutions compatible with existing enterprise infrastructures. By analyzing pertinent use cases from supply chain management, healthcare, and financial services, the investigation highlights how hybrid architectures effectively leverage the strengths of both private and public blockchains to achieve optimal performance and security outcomes. Ultimately, this research contributes to advancing blockchain adoption in complex organizational environments by providing a comprehensive framework for defining role-based responsibilities within hybrid systems and addressing challenges related to governance, trust, and cross-chain operability.
Keywords
Hybrid blockchain, enterprise applications, private blockchain, public blockchain, blockchain architecture, data privacy.
Conclusion
In conclusion, hybrid blockchain architectures represent a pivotal advancement in the blockchain domain, effectively marrying the decentralized transparency and security of public blockchains with the privacy, control, and performance advantages of private blockchains. This dual-layered approach offers enterprises a balanced framework where sensitive data remains securely confined to private networks, while essential auditability and trust are maintained through public ledgers. The modular and scalable design principles underpinning hybrid architectures enable flexible integration with existing enterprise systems, ensuring both operational efficiency and regulatory compliance. Although challenges persist, including technical complexity, governance, and interoperability concerns, ongoing innovations in middleware technologies and interoperability protocols promise to alleviate many of these obstacles. Comprehensive real-world applications across finance, healthcare, supply chain, and energy sectors highlight hybrid blockchain’s capacity to streamline processes, enhance security, and reduce costs, delivering tangible business value. As enterprises increasingly adopt these hybrid solutions, continued research and development will further refine architectures, standardize governance models, and expand deployment frameworks, solidifying hybrid blockchains as foundational infrastructures for secure, transparent, and efficient enterprise ecosystems. This evolution will not only respond to current market demands but also position organizations to leverage emerging technological and regulatory shifts with agility and confidence.
References
S. Dong, K. Abbas, M. Li, and J. Kamruzzaman, “Blockchain technology and application: an overview,” PeerJ Comput Sci, vol. 9, p. e1705, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.7717/PEERJ-CS.1705/TABLE-3.
[2] G. Habib, S. Sharma, S. Ibrahim, I. Ahmad, S. Qureshi, and M. Ishfaq, “Blockchain Technology: Benefits, Challenges, Applications, and Integration of Blockchain Technology with Cloud Computing,” Future Internet 2022, Vol. 14, Page 341, vol. 14, no. 11, p. 341, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3390/FI14110341.
[3] A. J. Bokolo and A. J. Bokolo, “Exploring interoperability of distributed Ledger and Decentralized Technology adoption in virtual enterprises,” Information Systems and e-Business Management 2022 20:4, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 685–718, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1007/S10257-022-00561-8.
[4] A. A. Al-awamy, N. Al-shaibany, A. Sikora, and D. Welte, “Hybrid Consensus Mechanisms in Blockchain: A Comprehensive Review,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 2025, no. 1, p. 5821997, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1155/INT/5821997.
[5] L. J. R. Lopez, D. Millan Mayorga, L. H. Martinez Poveda, A. F. C. Amaya, and W. Rojas Reales, “Hybrid Architectures Used in the Protection of Large Healthcare Records Based on Cloud and Blockchain Integration: A Review,” Computers 2024, Vol. 13, Page 152, vol. 13, no. 6, p. 152, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.3390/COMPUTERS13060152.
[6] M. Asante, G. Epiphaniou, C. Maple, H. Al-Khateeb, M. Bottarelli, and K. Z. Ghafoor, “Distributed Ledger Technologies in Supply Chain Security Management: A Comprehensive Survey,” IEEE Trans Eng Manag, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 713–739, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1109/TEM.2021.3053655.
[7] M. I. Hussain, M. K. I. Bhuiyan, S. A. Sumon, S. Akter, M. I. Hossain, and A. Akther, “Enhancing Data Integrity and Traceability in Industry Cyber Physical Systems (ICPS) through Blockchain Technology: A Comprehensive Approach,” Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 2883–2907, May 2024, doi: 10.54364/AAIML.2024.44168.
[8] J. Sedlmeir, J. Lautenschlager, G. Fridgen, and N. Urbach, “The transparency challenge of blockchain in organizations,” Electronic Markets 2022 32:3, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1779–1794, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1007/S12525-022-00536-0.
[9] A. Alkhateeb, C. Catal, G. Kar, and A. Mishra, “Hybrid Blockchain Platforms for the Internet of Things (IoT): A Systematic Literature Review,” Sensors 2022, Vol. 22, Page 1304, vol. 22, no. 4, p. 1304, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.3390/S22041304.
[10] A. K. Tyagi and R. Seranmadevi, “Blockchain for Enhancing Security and Privacy in the Smart Healthcare,” Digital Twin and Blockchain for Smart Cities, pp. 343–370, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1002/9781394303564.CH16;CTYPE:STRING:BOOK.
[11] A. Ali et al., “Blockchain-Powered Healthcare Systems: Enhancing Scalability and Security with Hybrid Deep Learning,” Sensors 2023, Vol. 23, Page 7740, vol. 23, no. 18, p. 7740, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.3390/S23187740.
[12] E. Yontar, “Challenges, threats and advantages of using blockchain technology in the framework of sustainability of the logistics sector,” Turkish Journal of Engineering, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 186–195, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.31127/TUJE.1094375.
[13] Z. Wang, L. Yu, and L. Zhou, “Navigating the Blockchain-Driven Transformation in Industry 4.0: Opportunities and Challenges for Economic and Management Innovations,” Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 3507–3549, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1007/S13132-024-02007-7/METRICS.
[14] C. Tricase et al., “A Review of Blockchain’s Role in E-Commerce Transactions: Open Challenges, and Future Research Directions,” Computers 2024, Vol. 13, Page 27, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 27, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.3390/COMPUTERS13010027.
[15] S. I. Sion, K. Zhang, A. April, T. M. Lutete, and C. Bouchard, “A Comprehensive Review of Multi-chain Architecture for Blockchain Integration in Organizations,” Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 527 LNBIP, pp. 5–24, 2024, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-70445-1_1.
[16] B. Shrimali and H. B. Patel, “Blockchain state-of-the-art: architecture, use cases, consensus, challenges and opportunities,” Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 6793–6807, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.JKSUCI.2021.08.005.
[17] J. H. Park and I. W. Joe, “Federated Learning-Based Prediction of Energy Consumption from Blockchain-Based Black Box Data for Electric Vehicles,” Applied Sciences 2024, Vol. 14, Page 5494, vol. 14, no. 13, p. 5494, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.3390/APP14135494.
[18] M. M. Saeed et al., “A comprehensive survey on 6G-security: physical connection and service layers,” Discover Internet of Things 2025 5:1, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 28-, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1007/S43926-025-00123-7.
How to Cite This Paper
Dhruv Srivastava, Dr. Kismat Chhillar (2025). Designing Hybrid Blockchain Architectures:
Defining Functional Roles for Private and
Public Chains in Enterprise Applications. International Journal of Computer Techniques, 12(6). ISSN: 2394-2231.
Designing Hybrid Blockchain Architectures Defining Functional Roles for Private and Public Chains in Enterprise ApplicationsDownload
Related Posts:








