ValidEase: NLP for Simplification and Summarization of Legal Documents
International Journal of Computer Techniques – Volume 12 Issue 2, 2025
Kushal Swamy, Omkar Salgare, Omdatta Sakhare, Shoaib Tamboli
Guide Name: Dr. Soumitra Das
Department of Computer Engineering,
Indira College of Engineering and Management, Pune
Abstract
The traditional approach to summarizing dense, complex, and jargon-filled legal documents is done manually and is very time-consuming, labor-intensive, prone to human biases, and applicability-driven. This study proposes the use of the T5 (Text-to-Text Transfer Transformer) for automatic summarization of legal documents with 100% text extraction, semantic preservation, and high readability. The Indian Legal Database Corpus (ILDC) is put forward as the primary dataset, which has case judgments written with expert-written summaries that can serve as an ideal benchmark for training and evaluating legal document summarization models. The proposed system uses NLP and is fine-tuned on this dataset which allows it to produce brief, legally accurate, and understandable summaries. All processes include comprehensive preprocessing, smart document chunking, and employing optimized techniques to enhance summary generation which solves the issue of large legal text processing. To ensure the model’s robustness and generalizability, further validation is conducted on legal texts beyond ILDC. Testing the model on different legal datasets, such as international case law, Supreme Court cases, or regulatory documents from various jurisdictions, allows for evaluating its adaptability across different legal traditions. Additionally, cross-domain testing on legal contracts, corporate policies, and government regulations is performed to assess its performance beyond case law. Exploring multilingual legal documents is also considered for expanding the model’s applicability in diverse legal settings. The evaluation process entrusts different scoring systems, like ROUGE for textual overlap, BLEU for fluency and coherence, and semantic similarity score evaluated with Sentence- BERT to ensure meaning retention. A model of T5 fine-tuning on ILDC is professed as effective in this study to produce an efficient and better-summarizing system in the area of legal texts.
Keywords
T5, ILDC: Indian Legal Database Corpus, NLP, Semantic Preservation
Conclusion & Future Work
This work shows that T5, when fine-tuned on ILDC, is highly effective at legal document summarization. The model assures 100% text extraction, meaning preservation, and readability, hence being appropriate for legal practitioners and researchers.
Future Work:
- The System is presently only able to process English Language legal documents, restricting its use in diverse legal jurisdictions that operate with more than one language. Training the T5 model with a multilingual legal database will enhance the model’s ability to process legal documents in regional languages like Hindi, Tamil, and Bengali, making it more acceptable for the Indian legal system.
- Automatic Citing of Relevant Case Laws in Summaries (Legal Citation Generation).
- Interactive Summarisation: Expanding interactive user control over how summarization parameters are set is known to improve usability. With it is possible to compress or lengthen certain summarization sections, or highlight particular sections, or a custom dictionary of legal terms may operate to generate summaries for them.
Acknowledgment
We recognize the open-source efforts of the Indian Legal Database Corpus (ILDC) and the NLP community for facilitating advancements in legal AI research.
References
- Raffel, C., Shazeer, N., Roberts, A., et al., “Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 21, no. 140, pp. 1-67, 2020.
- Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., et al., “Attention Is All You Need,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30, 2017.
- Zhang, J., Zhao, Y., Saleh, M., et al., “PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap- sentences for Abstractive Summarization,” International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2020.
- Narayan, S., Cohen, S. B., Lapata, M., “Don’t Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarization,” Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 2018.
- Chandrasekaran, M. K., Jain, S., “Legal Document Summarization using Transformer-based Models,” Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Computational Linguistics, 2021.
- Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. J., Adeli, E., et al., “On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 72, pp. 1-43, 2022.
- Sinha, R., “Leveraging NLP for Legal Document Analysis: A Survey,” Proceedings of the 2020 Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2020.
- Grover, C., McDonald, R., “Semantic Similarity Measures for Legal Text Processing,” Journal of Legal Studies in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 237-251, 2019.
How to Cite
Kushal Swamy, Omkar Salgare, Omdatta Sakhare, Shoaib Tamboli, “ValidEase: NLP for Simplification and Summarization of Legal Documents,” International Journal of Computer Techniques, Volume 12, Issue 2, 2025. ISSN 2394-2231
Share this content:
Post Comment