Paper Title : MULTI-STRATEGY SENTIMENT ANALYSIS OF CONSUMER REVIEWS WITH PARTIAL PHRASE MATCHING
ISSN : 2394-2231
Year of Publication : 2022
10.5281/zenodo.6410034
MLA Style: MULTI-STRATEGY SENTIMENT ANALYSIS OF CONSUMER REVIEWS WITH PARTIAL PHRASE MATCHING " R.Navin Kumar M.C.A.,M.Phil., S.Sneha " Volume 9 - Issue 2 International Journal of Computer Techniques (IJCT) ,ISSN:2394-2231 , www.ijctjournal.org
APA Style: MULTI-STRATEGY SENTIMENT ANALYSIS OF CONSUMER REVIEWS WITH PARTIAL PHRASE MATCHING " R.Navin Kumar M.C.A.,M.Phil., S.Sneha " Volume 9 - Issue 2 International Journal of Computer Techniques (IJCT) ,ISSN:2394-2231 , www.ijctjournal.org
Abstract
Sentiment analysis is useful in commercial intelligence application environment and recommender systems, because it is a very convenient channel for the two ends of the supply to communicate. In the sentiment analysis, many strategies and techniques were used, such as machine learning, polarity lexicons, natural language processing, and psychometric scales, which determine different types of sentiment analysis, such as assumptions made, method reveals, and validation dataset. Since Internet has become an excellent source of consumer reviews, the area of sentiment analysis (also called sentiment extraction, opinion mining, opinion extraction, and sentiment mining) has seen a large increase in academic interest over the last few years. Sentiment analysis mines opinions at word, sentence, and document levels, and gives sentiment polarities and strengths of articles. As known, the opinions of consumers are expressed in sentiment phrases. Traditional machine learning techniques can not represent the opinion of articles very well. This project proposes a multi-strategy sentiment analysis method with semantic similarity to solve the problem with partial phrase matching. Naïve Bayes classification is also applied to find the probability of data distribution in various category of data set. The project is designed using R Studio 1.0. The coding language used is R 3.4.4.
Reference
[1] L. Terveen, W. Hill, B. Amento, D. McDonald, and J. Creter, ‘‘PHOAKS: A system for sharing recommendations,’’ Commun. ACM, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 59–62, 1997. [2] J. Tatemura, ‘‘Virtual reviewers for collaborative exploration of movie reviews,’’inProc.5thInt.Conf.Intell.UserInterfaces,2000,pp. 272–275. [3] X. Hu, L. Tang, J. Tang, and H. Liu, ‘‘Exploiting social relations for sentiment analysis in microblogging,’’ in Proc. 6th ACM Int. Conf. Web Search Data Mining, 2013, pp. 537–546. [4] L.-W. Ku, Y.-T. Liang, and H.-H. Chen, ‘‘Opinion extraction, summarizationandtrackinginnewsandBlogCorpora,’’inProc .AAAISpringSymp., Comput. Approaches Anal. Weblogs, 2006, pp. 100–107. [5] A. C. König and E. Brill, ‘‘Reducing the human overhead in text categorization,’’ in Proc. 12th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discovery Data Mining, 2006, pp. 598–603. [6] F. Zhou, R. J. Jiao, and J. S. Linsey, ‘‘Latent customer needs elicitation by use case analogical reasoning from sentiment analysis of online product reviews,’’ J. Mech. Des., vol. 137, no. 7, p. 071401, 2015 [7] E. Cambria, ‘‘Affective computing and sentiment analysis,’’ IEEE Intell. Syst., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 102–107, Mar./Apr. 2016 [8] M. Govindarajan, ‘‘Sentiment analysis of restaurant reviews using hybrid classification method,’’ in Proc. 2nd IRF Int. Conf., Chennai India, Feb. 2014, pp. 127–133. 11. Hill, W.C., Stead, L., Rosenstein, M., and Furnas, G. Recommending and evaluating choices in a virtual community of use. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI’95 (Denver, May 7–11). ACM Press, New York, N.Y., pp. 194–201. 12. Maltz, D., and Ehrlich, K. Pointing the way: Active collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI’95 (Denver, May 7–11). ACM Press, New York., N.Y., pp. 202–209. 13. Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P., and Riedl, J. GroupLens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In Proceeding of the ACM 1994 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. pp. 175–186. 14. Shardanand, U., and Maes, P. Social information filtering: Algorithms for automating “word of mouth.” In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI’95(Denver, May 7–11). ACM Press, New York. N.Y., pp. 210–217. 15. Resnick, P., et al. GroupLens: An Open Architecture for Collaborative Filtering of Netnews. Proceedings of ACM CSCW’94, 1994, 175-186. 16. Shardanand, U. and Maes, P. Social Information Filtering: Algorithms for Automating “Word of Mouth.” Proceedings of ACM CHI’95, 1995, 210-217. 17. Goldberg, D., et al. Using Collaborative Filtering to Weave an Information Tapestry. Communications of the ACM, vol. 35, No. 12, 1992, 61-70. [18] J. Wiebe, T. Wilson, and C. Cardie. Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language. Language Resources and Evaluation, 39:165–210, 2005. [19] J. Fowler and N. Christakis. The dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network. BMJ: British medical journal, 2008. Wiebe, J., Wilson, T., and Bell, M. Identify collocations for recognizing opinions. Proceedings of ACL/EACL2001 Workshop on Collocation.2001. Pang, B., Lee, L., and Vaithyanathan, S. Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on EMNLP,pages 79-86. 2002. Dave, K., Lawrence, S., and Pennock, D.M. Mining the peanut gallery: Opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. WWW 2003,pages 519- 528, 2003. Riloff, E. and Wiebe, J. Learning extraction patterns for subjective expressions. Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on EMNLP,pages 105-112. 2003. Liu, B., Hu, M. and Cheng, J. Opinion Observer: Analyzing and comparing opinions on the web. WWW 2005, pages 342-351. 2005. Cardie, C., Wiebe, J., Wilson, T. and Litman, D. Combining lowlevel and summary representations of opinions for multiperspective question answering. Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium Workshop,pages 20-27. 2004. Takamura, H., Inui, T. and Okumura, M.. Extracting Semantic Orientations of Words Using Spin Model. ACL 2005, pages 133-140. 2005. Adomavicius, G. ,Tuzhilin, A. (2005), "Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the stateof-the-art and possible extensions", IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Volume 17, Issue 6.
Keywords
— Sentiment Analysis, Naïve Bayes Classification, Multiple Strategy, Machine Learning.